WASHINGTON: The United States underestimates the long-term impact of civilian deaths on the success of military missions and is failing to implement lessons learned from 15 years in Afghanistan, according to a report released Wednesday.
While the US military is committed to avoiding civilian casualties, the report said that mistaken air strikes, misidentified targets, unexploded ordinance and rogue partners have frequently led to non-combatant deaths in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and elsewhere. The study by Open Society Foundations, a charity founded by US magnate and philanthropist George Soros, found that in Afghanistan, such deaths seriously undermined the mission and fueled the growth of the Taliban.
“Civilian harm accelerated the insurgency and undermined the US and Afghan governments,” said Army combat veteran Christopher Kolenda, a study co-author. “It was like burning a candle at both ends with a blowtorch.” The report describes several causes of civilian casualties, and is particularly critical of unplanned air strikes to support troops on the ground as being a “primary driver” of
civilian harm. In Afghanistan in 2008, for instance, air strikes accounted for 64 percent of the 828
non-combatant deaths blamed on pro-government forces, and 26 percent of those killed overall.
“Signature strikes — when an individual or group of military-aged males is tracked over time and targeted for engaging in behavior that is deemed to be suspicious — are a particular concern,” the report states. Additionally, the report blasts “predatory partners” the United States worked with in Afghanistan who could “operate with near impunity due to their close and highly visible relationship to the US military.” Study authors make a slew of recommendations including the implementation of “civilian protection cells” that would monitor civilian harm and communicate with commanders to improve battlefield decision making.
The military should also “respond to civilian harm in ways that avoid premature denials, provide timely and clear communication of the outcomes of investigations and accountability measures to host nations, victims, and the public,” the report states. Lessons learned need to be applied to US military interventions in Iraq and Syria, where a US-led coalition is conducting air strikes and working with local forces to kill Islamic State jihadists; in Yemen, where strikes target Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula; and in Pakistan, where US drones hunt the Taliban. The report credited the Pentagon with going to great lengths to protect civilians, but blasted partner forces. “In Yemen, Iraq, Syria, and Pakistan, US forces are confronted with incredibly challenging targeting and operational environments, and have been taking considerable steps to protect civilians,” the report states.
But “other parties to the conflict have at times displayed a callous disregard for civilian life, including egregious war crimes in Syria, in particular.”
